2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7340
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Bansal, J
VAIBHAV KAKKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. – Respondent
TEST.CAS. 42/2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Shrey Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Abhinav Singh, Ms. Bharti Yadav, Ms. Sanya Sud
Probate granted under Indian Succession Act for a Will executed in favor of a trust benefitting natural heirs, exempting administrative bond requirements.
Headnote:The petition seeks probate under Sections 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for the Will of the Testator, who expired on 14th February 2020. The Will is duly executed, with no Class I legal heirs, and the Testator's siblings are mentally challenged. The court finds the affidavit-cum-no-objection from the beneficiaries supports the request for probate. The main questions framed relate to the need for the administrative-cum-surety bond. The Court allows the petition and issues the probate in favor of the petitioner.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. probate sought for a will with no class i heirs. (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner appointed executor and also serves as trustee. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 20) |
| 3. preparedness and non-objection from involved parties. (Para 12 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. court issues probate with exemption for administrative bond. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
1. The present petition has been filed under Sections 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter ‘Act’) read with Section 300 of the Act seeking grant of probate in respect of the Will dated 4th April 2019 (hereinafter ‘Will’) of late Shri Rakesh Bhatia (resident of B-3, Gangotri Enclave, Alaknanda, New Delhi-110019), who expired on 14th February 2020 (hereinafter ‘Testator’) in Delhi.
2. The particulars of the estate of the Testator in respect of which the probate of the Will is sought has been filed along with the present petition.
3. It is stated that the Will is the last and final will of the Testator, which was duly executed, attested and registered with the Office of the Sub-Registrar – V on 6th April 2019 vide registration no. 244 in Book No.3, Volume No. 2195 on pages 169-176.
4. The Testator is not survived by any Class I legal heir.
5. The Testator is survived by his two siblings, namely, Shri Sanjay Bhatia (brother/ respondent no.3) and Smt. Beena Bhatia (sister/ respondent no.4), together who comprise his Class II legal heirs.
6. The aforesaid Class II legal heirs of the Testator are mentally challenged and dependent for their basic day-to-day functioning. As per the reports from the Department of Psychiatry, AIIMS, the defendant no.4 has mental disability of about 70%-80% and the defendant no.3 has mental disability of about 50%.
7. Being the legally appointed guardian of the respondents no.3 and 4, the Testator created the respondent no.2 trust, namely, Beena Sanjay Welfare Trust for the welfare, well-being and benefit of the respondents no.3 and 4 including but not limited to their upkeep, care, maintenance and financial support. The aforesaid Class II legal heirs of the Testator, the respondents no.3 and 4, are the only beneficiary of the respondent no.2 trust.
8. The respondent no.2 was created in the year 2016 and has been duly registered under the Indian Trusts Act, 1999 vide Registration No. 594, in Book No. 4, Volume No. 4185 on page 159-177 on 26th April, 2016.
9. Originally, the following persons were the trustees of the respondent no.2:
a) Late Shri Rakesh Bhatia (Testator)
b) Mr. Vijay K Sondhi
c) Mr. Vaibhav Kakkar (petitioner)
10. As per the Will, the Testator appointed Mr. Vijay K Sondhi as the Executor of the Will and in the event of his demise, the petitioner was to be the Executor of the Will.
11. Owing to the sad demise of Mr. Vijay K Sondhi on 28th January, 2022, the petitioner became the only surviving Executor of the Will as well as the sole surviving trustee of the respondent no.2.
12. Subsequent to the demise of the Testator, who was the only surviving legal guardian of the respondents no.3 and 4, the petitioner along with Mrs. Aditi Tomar, applied for certificates for appointment as legal guardians of the respondents no.3 and 4 and the same were granted on 18th March 2025.
13. The petitioner had previously filed a petition, being TEST.CAS. 50/2024, before this Court seeking probate of the Will, wherein the Court pointed out certain defects prior to issuance of notice.
14. Accordingly, the said petition was withdrawn vide order dated 1st April, 2025 with liberty to file a fresh petition.
15. Notice in the present petition was issued to, and accepted on behalf of the respondent no.1, on 28th April 2025.
16. Counsel for the respondents no.2 to 4 entered appearance on 2nd July, 2025.
17. On behalf of the respondents no.2, an affidavit-cum-no-objection has been filed by Mr. Krishna Nand Thakur, the authorized legal representative of the respondent no.2, supporting the case of the petitioner. On behalf of the respondents no.3 and 4, an affidavit-cum-n