Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, SHAIL JAIN, JJ
M/S. ARAV TRADING COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case facts including the seizure of imported goods. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding similarity to previously cleared goods and arbitrary enforcement. (Para 11 , 12 , 15) |
| 3. legal debate on obscenity standards and customs authority's subjective judgment. (Para 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. the necessity for current standards in defining obscenity in customs. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 5. final order for provisional release of goods pending clear policy decision. (Para 26 , 27 , 30) |
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 11th August, 2025 and the impugned Seizure Memo dated 21st February, 2025 vide which the imported products of the Petitioner have been seized by the Customs Department on the ground that the same are prohibited from import.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the Petitioner had imported various products vide Bill of Entry dated 23rd January, 2025, including products declared as ‘Face Roller (Beauty Care Products)’ under the Customs Tariff Head No. 39269099 (hereinafter “subject imported products”). It is stat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
