Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
NEERAJ AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the medical incident leading to fir. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. arguments for petition modification on bail conditions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. court observations on bail condition legality and rights. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. final ruling on the application. (Para 29) |
CRL. M.A. 20286/2025, CRL.M.C. 25972/2025 & CRL.M.A. 27317/2025
1. These applications have been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for bringing on record additional documents.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the documents are taken on record.
3. The applications are disposed of.
CRL.M.A. 30013/2024
1. The instant application has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner/Applicant for modification of the bail Condition No.(c) and (d) of Paragraph 32 of the Judgment dated 28.08.2024 passed by this Court by which the Applicant herein was granted bail.
2. The Applicant had filed CRL.M.C. 4848/2024 for grant of bail in FIR No.210/2022 dated 25.10.2022 registered at Police Station Greater Kailash-1 for offences under Sections 304, 419, 420, 196, 197, 198, 201 and 201B IPC.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the ca
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
