Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
PUNITA KHATTER – Appellant
Versus
EXPLORERS TRAVEL & TOUR PVT LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to notice and its grounds (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. details of company management and removals (Para 3 , 4 , 27) |
| 3. arguments on rightful retention of company property (Para 8 , 28 , 32) |
| 4. court's affirmation of liability and summoning adequacy (Para 10 , 35 , 38) |
| 5. conclusion of the case merits (Para 41) |
JUDGMENT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “ Cr.P.C .”) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Smt. Punita Khatter for quashing of the Notice and Order dated 16.03.2017 and the proceedings pending in the Court of Ld. ACMM, New Delhi in Complaint Case No.470389/2016 titled as Explorers Travel and Tour Private Limited vs. Punita Khatter.
2. Respondent had filed a Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C . against the Petitioner, Smt. Punita Khatter for the offence under Section 452 Companies Act, 2013 .
3. Briefly stated, the Respondent Company was incorporated on 30.11.1989 under the name and style of Explorers Travel & Tour Pvt. Ltd. under the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner-Punita Khatter apart from being 35% shareholder of the Company, was appointed as Managing Director on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
