Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. HARI SHANKAR, AJAY DIGPAUL, JJ
MUDIT GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the capacity to understand versus physical sight. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. facts surrounding the petitioner's application and selection. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments about the interpretation of disability and job requirements. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's analysis of the functional requirements in relation to disabilities. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. conclusion on legal standing of the case, regarding functional requirements. (Para 19 , 20) |
WP (C) 938/2025 [Mudit Gupta v Airports Authority of India & others]
1. Said Lady Smart, from Jonathan Swift’s “Polite Conversation in Three Dialogues”, penned early in the 18th century – “There’s none so blind as they that won’t see”.
2. We, in this batch of cases, are faced with the question – Can the blind see?
3. Law, however, has a habit of complicating the simplest of issues.
4. We have, in the pantheon of Counsel in our Court, lawyers such as Mr. Rungta, who argued these matters with characteristic poise and composure, and Mr. Rahul Bajaj, who have triumphantly breached the boundary between blindness and vision. We have often wondered, after observing them at their best, whether they are not more accomplished than
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
