Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV NARULA, J
KHUSHWANT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
SMT GAGANDEEP SIDHU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common factual basis for disputes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. argument against previous orders lacking proper evidence. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's reliance on statutory interpretation for shared household definition. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 4. right of residence under dv act is not contingent on title. (Para 12 , 14 , 19) |
| 5. summary dismissal of petitions without altering established rights. (Para 28 , 30) |
1. Both these revision petitions arise out of disputes concerning the same property and rest on common factual foundations. As the grounds urged and the submissions addressed on either side are identical in substance, they are being decided together by this judgment.
Factual Background
2. The Respondent in both petitions, Gagandeep Sidhu, got married to Saravjeet Singh, the son of the Petitioners, namely Khushwant Kaur (mother-in-law) and late Daljit Singh (father-in-law), on 14th November, 2010 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. After marriage, Gagandeep Sidhu moved into her matrimonial home at House No. 11/8, Gali No. 1 & 2, Old Gobindpura Extension, Delhi-1100511. However, the matrimonial relationship soon deteriorated, giving rise to disputes between her and the Petitio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
