IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
MEENU – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. – Respondent
1. The present writ petition has been filed for restraining respondent no. 2 from carrying out unauthorized construction at Plot No. 18, Khasra No. 361, Khata No. 147, Khewat No. 44, Rani Bagh, Rishi Nagar, Shakur Basti, Delhi -110034.
2. When the matter was listed for hearing on the first date, i.e., 09th September, 2025, this Court was informed that the petitioner had no concern with the property in question, given that she stays at least 15 streets away from the property in question. Further, the Court was informed that the petitioner is not a bona fide resident of the address, as mentioned in the Memo of Parties. The order dated 09th September, 2025, reads as under:
“1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent no. 1 for restraining respondent no. 2, from carrying unauthorized construction at Plot No. 18, Khasra No. 361, Khata No. 147, Khewat No. 44, Rani Bagh, Rishi Nagar, Shakur Basti, Delhi-110034.
2. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2, i.e., the property owner/builder, submits that the petitioner has no concern with the property in question and that the petitioner stays at least 15 streets away.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.