Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AJAY SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail due to lack of evidence (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. discussion of evidentiary standards regarding cdr data (Para 26 , 29 , 30) |
| 3. court's reasoning on granting bail based on insufficient evidence (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 4. final conclusion and disposal of bail application (Para 38 , 39) |
1. First Bail Application has been filed by the Applicant/Ajay Sharma under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNS S ), 2023 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ), 2023, seeking the grant of Regular Bail in FIR No. 67 of 2020, P.S. Kanjhawala, under Section 302 /201/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) read with Section 25 of the Arms Act , 1959.
2. Briefly stated, it is the case of the Applicant/Ajay Sharma S/o Chander Dev r/o C- 59-C, Rajeev Nagar, Begumpur, Delhi, that he is a law-abiding citizen of India and is a permanent resident of C-59 Rajiv Nagar, Begumpur Delhi. The Applicant submits has been in Judicial Custody since 16.10.2020, i.e. for approximately 5 years.
3. The Applicant submits that on 19.02.2020; vide DD No. 72-B, telephonic information was rec
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
