Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MR. KENECHUKWU OKAFOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application under ndps act initiated. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. prosecution’s responsibility and evidence integrity highlighted. (Para 3 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 3. concerns regarding validity and independence of the search process. (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 39) |
| 4. court's emphasis on statutory conditions for bail. (Para 35 , 48) |
| 5. final ruling against bail application stated. (Para 49 , 50) |
1. Bail Application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023/ Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ( Cr.P.C ), 1973 has been filed on behalf of the Applicant, Kenechukwu Okafor, seeking Regular Bail in relation to FIR No. 161/2022 under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as “NDPS Act”) and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 , dated 14.10.2022 registered at P.S. Bindapur.
2. As per the case of the Prosecution, on 25.02.2022 at about 06:05 PM, on the basis of the Secret Information, Kenechukwu Okafor (the Applicant herein) was apprehended near Najafgarh Road at around 07:30 PM – 07:40 PM with a large number of Drugs, and 300 gm of Heroin was recov
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
