Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
MOTI LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal under section 374(2) cr.p.c. for conviction under pocso. (Para 1) |
| 2. consistent testimony from child victim detailing abuse supports conviction. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. medical evidence substantiates allegations of sexual assault. (Para 7 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. arguments regarding testimony reliability and evidence challenges are dismissed. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 15) |
| 5. court affirms conviction based on credible testimonies and medical support. (Para 13 , 14 , 16) |
1. By way of the present appeal filed under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C ., the appellant has assailed the judgment of conviction dated 01.12.2018 and the order on sentence dated 21.12.2018 passed by the learned ASJ-06, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in SC No. 72/2018, whereby he has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years along with payment of fine of Rs.10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for ten months. The benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C . was also extended to the appellant.
2. Brief facts as noted by the Sessions Court are as follows :-
“Brief
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
