Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JASMEET SINGH, J
M/S TIRUPATI BUILDING AND OFFICE PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
M/S CHAUHAN JEWELLERS PVT LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks to challenge an arbitral award. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. disputes over maintenance agreement and unpaid charges. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. limited court interference upheld; no maintenance agreement denies liability. (Para 15 , 18) |
1. This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“1996 Act”) seeking to challenge the Arbitral Award dated 26.05.2025 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in DIAC/ 4513D/ 07-22. titled as “Chauhan Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. Tirupati Buildings and Office Pvt Ltd.”.
2. The facts are that the petitioner is a builder company which goes by the name of Tirupati Buildings and Office Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner company is registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner is also the owner of "Pinnacle Mall., situated in Dwarka, New Delhi.
3. The respondent is a Company is registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The respondent company is engaged in the business of retail of jewellery.
4. The petitioner was the owner of free-hold commercial property, bearing shop no. 3, measuring 670 sq. yards, situated on the Ground Floor of Pinnacle Mall (previously known as Welcome Mall), Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075 (“pro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
