Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, JJ
SUB KRISHAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner challenges disciplinary actions under army rules. (Para 1 , 2 , 12) |
| 2. the procedure for imposing disciplinary punishment is outlined. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 18) |
| 3. limits of judicial review in military cases are established. (Para 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. the court confirms the legitimacy of the imposed punishment. (Para 31) |
| 5. the court directs processing of the petitioner's pension. (Para 32 , 33) |
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayers:-
“(a) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, Direction or Order quashing and setting aside the
(b) impugned Punishment order dated 17.08.2010 (Annexure P- 1) "Severe Reprimand" awarded to petitioner on basis of Charge-Sheet dated 9.08.2010 (Annexure P-2) being illegal, arbitrary, afterthought, unjust, ineffective and not maintainable in law and facts and against the principles of natural justice as stated in the preceding paras, in the interest of justice;
(c)ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT or Order by quashing and setting aside the Discharge Order No.1523/T-4/24/CA-2(MP) dated 27.01.2012 (Annexure P-3) and Movement Order No.23602/Est date
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
