Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, MADHU JAIN, JJ
SH. SANDEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges dismissal of compassionate appointment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. petitioner claims unfair treatment regarding regularization. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. court observes inconsistencies in employment policy. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 4. misapplication of umadevi principles noted. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. regularization mandated based on prolonged service. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
1. This petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 20.02.2020 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. 490/2020, titled Sh. Sandeep Kumar v. The Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law & Justice, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Impugned Order’), dismissing the O.A. filed by the petitioner herein.
FACTS OF THE CASE
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner’s father was a permanent Group ‘D’ employee with the respondent organisation, Department of Law and Justice and served as a Peon until his demise on 23.02.2005. He was the sole earning member of the family, and upon his father’s death, the petitioner’s mothe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
