Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
SEQUENOM INC – Appellant
Versus
THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present appeals involve an interpretation of the exclusions from patentability in respect of diagnostic processes/methods under Section 3 (i) of the Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter “the Act”).
3. These are two appeals filed under Section 117A of the Act, challenging the impugned order dated 12th December, 2019, (hereinafter “first impugned order”) in C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 448/2022 and impugned order dated 20th January, 2020, (hereinafter “second impugned order”) in C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 13/2022, passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents.
4. The Appellants had preferred the following two Patent Applications:
* No. 2476/DELNP/2011 (hereinafter “first patent application”)
* No. 3139/DELNP/2012 (hereinafter “second patent application”)
Both the first and second patent applications were in respect of inventions titled “Process and Compositions for Methylation-Based Enrichment of Fetal Nucleic Acid from a Mate
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article