Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
H S BANKA – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN LAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eviction petition filed due to bona fide requirement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. tenant's defense against bona fide claim. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. landlord's need for business is sufficient for eviction. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. eviction criteria established under drc act. (Para 21 , 24) |
| 5. final revision petition decision granted in favor of landlord. (Para 26) |
1. The petitioner/ landlord1 filed an eviction petition on dated 26.09.2011 being eviction petition no. E-25/2011 (RC/ ARC no. 206/2016) under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act 2, 1958 against the respondent/ tenant3 seeking eviction of Shop No. 2 property No. F-171/4, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi4 as per the Site Plan, before the learned Additional Rent Controller, Karkardooma Court, Delhi5, as there was a bona fide requirement for his own commencing business.
2. It was his case in the amended eviction petition that being a senior citizen with no other source of income, he required the subject shop for doing business so that he may get sufficient income. As per the landlord, the tenant was originally inducted by Smt. Shakuntala Devi6, by way of an oral agreement from whom the landlord herein purchased the prope
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
