SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7702

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J
VISHAL @ PAIWALA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
BAIL APPLN. No. 2883/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Pradeep Singh Rana, Mr. Gagan Bhatnagar, Mr. Rahul Prashar, Mr. Tushar Rohmetra, Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Mr. Anubhav Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for State, Inspector Rajesh Verma

Seriousness of charges and involvement at the crime scene outweighed hallmarks for granting bail.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 (corresponding to Section 439 of CrPC) - Bail application dismissed due to gravity of charges and prima facie evidence of presence at crime scene - Accused present with group involved in critical situation and attempted to establish common intention. (Paras 40, 42, 46)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Test for granting bail - Bail is not to be withheld as punishment, but requires assessment of likelihood to appear at trial. (Para 21)

Facts of the case:
The Applicant, a 20-year-old, is accused of murder and attempted murder following a shooting incident. While CCTV footage indicated his presence, his role in the violence was contested as minimal. He surrendered voluntarily after a period of absconding.

Findings of Court:
The evidence presented indicates significant involvement of the Applicant and his association with co-accused, furthering judicial custody even after surrender.

Issues: The court assessed serious allegations against the Applicant, weighing bail against potential witness intimidation and flight risk.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that seriousness of the charges, along with the Applicant's delay in surrendering and his presence at the scene, warranted denial of bail despite clean antecedents.

Result: Bail Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. application for bail filed and previous bail rejected. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of crime and role of the applicant. (Para 3 , 4 , 10)
3. arguments for bail based on applicant's character. (Para 12 , 14 , 16)
4. evaluating bail in the context of absence of evidence. (Para 17 , 19 , 21)
5. court's rationale for denying bail. (Para 42 , 46 , 47)
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Regular Bail Application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘ BNSS ’) [corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973] on behalf of the Applicant/Vishal @ Paiwala in FIR No.591/2024 dated 05.09.2024 under Sections 103(1)/109(1)/333/3(5)/ 238/324/190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNS’)& Sections 25 /27 of the Arms Act , registered at PS Narela.

2. The Regular Bail Application of the Applicant was dismissed by the Ld. ASJ vide Order dated 05.09.2025.

3. The brief facts of the case are that on 04.09.2024, an information was received at PS Narela vide DD Nos. 139A and 141A, regarding a firing incident that took place at Veer Properties on Gonda Road, Narela, Delhi. Upon reaching the location, the Investigation Team found that one person had died (later identified as Manish) and two others, i.e. Praveen and Kulbir Singh, had sustained bullet injuries,who had already been shifted to the hospital.

4. During the investigations, it emerged that prior to the main incident, the Applicant was allegedly present at a vacant plot near Veer Properties where the accused persons were sitting. According to the statement of one Abhishek recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C , the Applicant had allegedly slapped him from behind. However, CCTV footage shows that after this alleged slap, Abhishek sat peacefully with the accused persons, after which he went to the deceased’s office, following which the quarrel escalated into the shooting incident.

5. It is submitted that the Senior Officers from the local police along with the District Mobile Crime Team of Outer North District and a Team from the FSL Rohini, inspected the scene of crime and conducted photography and forensic examination.

6. When the IO reached Max Super Specialty Hospital, Shalimar Bagh, he found the injured, Kulbir Singh, unfit to give a statement. The statement of his brother, Satbir Singh/Complainant, who had shifted him to the hospital, was recorded. He disclosed that on 04.09.2024, around 7 PM, while he was in Biswamil, Sonipat, he received a call from Manish (the deceased), a resident of his village, asking him to come to his office on Gonda Road, Narela. Shortly thereafter, Manish called him again to come quickly. A third call was made by Manish, who informed that co-accused Deepak had assaulted Kulbir and injured him on the head.

7. The Complainant further stated that upon reaching Manish’s office at around 7:45 PM, he saw co-accused Deepak exiting the office while holding a pistol. Deepak attempted to flee on a motorcycle, but when the Complainant tried to stop him, he abandoned the motorcycle and escaped on foot. The office window glass had been shattered. Upon entering the office, the Complainant found Manish lying unresponsive with his face down, on the sofa, while his associate Praveen was lying on the floor in pain. The Complainant was initially unable to locate his brother, Kulbir and began calling out for him. In response, Kulbir, who was lying between the bed and the office wall, cried out that co-accused Deepak had shot him and pleaded for help.While being taken to Raja Harish Chandra Hospital, Kulbir told the Complainant that a dispute had occurred between Manish and co-accused Deepak over Rs. 20,000/-. Following this, Deepak, along with his associateco-accused Ashish and some others, had attacked them.

8. Based on the Complainant’s statement, FIR No. 591/2024 dated 05.09.2024 was registered at PS Narela under Sections 103(1)/109(1)/333/3(5) BNS and Sections 25

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top