Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JJ
M/S TEFCIL BREWERIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S ALFA LAVAL INDIA PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to arbitral judgment under section 34. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary of facts establishing arbitration process. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments regarding correction of awards and timelines. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. judicial analysis of limitation timelines. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. final dismissal of the appeal. (Para 62) |
Prathiba M. Singh J.,
1. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant-M/s Tefcil Breweries Ltd. under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 challenging the judgment dated 8th January, 2025 (hereinafter, ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the ld. Single Judge of this Court in O.M.P. (COMM) 479/2018 titled ‘Tefcil Breweries Ltd. v. Alfa Laval (India) Limited’.
2. Vide the impugned judgment, the petition filed by the Appellant under Section 34 of the Act assailing the Arbitral Award dated 17th October, 2017 and additional award dated 18th May, 2018 has been dismissed by the ld. Single Judge of this Court on the ground of being barred by limitation.
Facts
3. The background of the present case is that the App
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
