Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JYOTI SINGH, J
DAULAT RAM DHARAM BIR AUTO PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
PIVOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to orders of the arbitrator (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. interim measures sought by appellants (Para 5 , 9) |
| 3. arguments of pivotal against interim measures (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. assessment of prima facie case and irreparable injury (Para 14 , 17) |
| 5. judicial approach to interim relief in arbitration (Para 18 , 24) |
1. ARB. A. (COMM.) 30/2025 is filed by the Appellants laying a challenge to order dated 13.12.2023 and ARB. A. (COMM.) 31/2025 is filed to assail order dated 13.05.2025, both passed by the learned Arbitrator under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act , 1996 (‘1996 Act’) in the ongoing arbitral proceedings. The appeals were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment, due to commonality of facts and issues raised by the respective parties.
2. To the extent necessary, facts as pleaded are that Appellants and Forgings Private Limited (‘Forgings’), being the owners of land admeasuring 12.012 acres at Village Mujheri, Tehsil Ballabgarh, Faridabad (‘subject land’), by way of four separate Collaboration Agreements, all dated 04.06.2007, transferred development rights over the subject land in favour of DD Global Capital P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
