SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 8464

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
INDER DEV GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 – Respondent


V. KAMESWAR RAO , J. (ORAL)

1. The captioned petitions have been filed impugning notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by the respondent who is the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The contentions of the petitioner is that the said notices and all subsequent proceedings emanating there from are wholly without jurisdiction void ab intio and in contravention to the statutory scheme under Section 151A of the Act read with “E Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022” (the Scheme).

2. As the present petitions agitate a common issue, i.e., whether the JAO would have the jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Act, we may proceed to decide them together.

3. The contention of Mr. Kumail Abbas, learned counsel for the petitioners is that on 31.03.2023, the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2022 (TOLA) inserted Section 151A into the Act, mandating that all notices under Section 148 of the Act must be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) alone. In furtherance, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) vide notification S.O.1466(E) dated 29.03.2022 introduce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top