SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 8475

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RACHNA MEHNIDRATTA – Appellant
Versus
GIRDHARI LAL – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Judgment Reserved on: 15.11.2025

Judgment pronounced on: 21.11.2025

+ FAO 78/2023 & CM APPLs. 15779/2023, 21111/2023

RACHNA MEHNIDRATTA .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Harshit Vashisht, Mr. Avinash Kapoor, Mr. Dipayan Gupta and Mr. Shivdeep Kumar Tripathi, Advocates

Versus

GIRDHARI LAL .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg, Advocate alongwith respondent in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA

JUDGMENT

CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.

1. The present appeal under section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1 and section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (the CPC)assails the correctness of the order dated 20.02.2023 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in CS No. 582/2019, titled as “Girdhari Lal v. Narender Kumar & Ors.”, whereby the trial court allowed the respondent/plaintiff’s application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC and restrained the defendants, including the appellant/defendant herein, from creating any third-party interest in the suit property and from carrying out any construction entailing structural changes therein during the pendency of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top