$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 360/2025, CM APPL. 71840/2025, CM APPL.

71841/2025 NARESH MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Saini, Adv.

versus SHANKAR LAL BANSAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Viney Sharma, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 20.11.2025

1. By virtue of the present petition, the petitioner/ tenant, inter alia seeks setting aside of the order dated 10.06.2025 (impugned order) passed by the learned Rent Controller, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (learned RC) in RC ARC No.611/2024 entitled ‘Shankar Lal Bansal v. Naresh Mittal’ filed by the respondent/ landlord wherein the application seeking leave to defend of the tenant has been dismissed.

2. It is the case of the tenant before this Court that there was no landlord-tenant relationship between the parties, particularly since as per the very Will dated 10.08.1999 upon which the landlord had relied, the subject premises was under the possession of one Sh. Kamla Prasad, brother of the landlord, and not of the landlord himself, as also that there were numerous inconsistencies in the eviction petition filed by the landlord, and the same was further barred by res judi