Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR. TEJAS KARIA, J
MEDILABO RFP INC – Appellant
Versus
THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of patent refusal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against patent denial. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. respondent’s defenses on treatment method. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. overview of the invention and claims. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. discussion on claims and amendments. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. court's analysis on patentability issues. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. critiques on respondent's interpretations. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. citations of relevant cases in support. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 9. examining objections and procedural issues. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 10. final judgment and order for reconsideration. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 11. conclusion and directive for application. (Para 57 , 58) |
JUDGMENT
INTRODUCTION
1. This Appeal has been filed under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970 (“Act”) against the order (“Impugned Order”) dated 21.12.2023, passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs (“Respondent / Controller”), refusing the Patent Application No. 202117034705 (“Subject Application”) on the grounds under Section 3 (i) of the Act.
FACTUAL MATRIX
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
