Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANIL KSHETARPAL, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JJ
JAGDISH KAUR – Appellant
Versus
JASBIR SINGH SANDHU & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction under section 37 and errors in arbitral awards. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background of the case involving arbitration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. findings and conclusions in the arbitration award. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. parties’ arguments regarding the arbitral award. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. court's scrutiny and standard of review under section 34. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. discussion of computational errors in the arbitral award. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. modification of the arbitral award for correction of errors. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. final conclusion and order of the court. (Para 43 , 44) |
JUDGMENT
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
1. Through the present Appeal under Section 37 , [ Section 37 .] of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 , [A&C Act.], the Appellant (Petitioner before the learned District Judge) assails the correctness of the Judgment and Order dated 18.07.2024 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’], whereby the learned District Judge dismissed the petition [hereinafter referred to as ‘ Section 34 Petition’] filed by the Appellant under Section 34 , [ Section 34 .] of the A&C Act and uph
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
