SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 9759

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HAV/NA SHYAM SHANKAR PRAJAPATI VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS


$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16359/2025 VIPIN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Utsav Jain, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajendra Sahu, SPC with Mr. Vinod Sawant, Law Officer CRPF, Insp. Athurv, CRPF, Mr. Inderpal and Mr.

Ramniwas Yadav, CRPF.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

O R D E R

% 29.10.2025

1. The petitioner has been disqualified for recruitment to the post of Motor Mechanic Vehicle owing to a tattoo on his right forearm. The petitioner has gone to the extent of stating that if he is allowed, he is even willing to undergo surgery to remove the tattoo.

2. Prima facie, we do not understand how the mere presence of a tattoo on the right forearm of a candidate can disqualify him for recruitment to the Forces. We may note the guideline to this effect, as issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, which reads thus: “Tattoo : The practice of engraving / tattooing in India is prevalent since time immemorial, but has been limited to depict the name or a religious figure, invariably on inner aspect of forearm and usually on left side. On the other hand the present young generatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top