SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMRITA NARANG – Appellant
Versus
HARPAL SINGH & ANR. – Respondent


$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 2nd December 2025 + CS(OS) 93/2023 with I.A. 2556/2023, I.A. 8465/2023 and I.A.

1913/2024 AMRITA NARANG .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shailen Bhatia, Ms. Ekta Nayar Saini, Ms. Deeksha Gulati, Mr. Aparna Sharma, Mr. Bhaven and Mr.

Abhishek, Advocates.

versus HARPAL SINGH & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Mohan, Advocate for D-1.

Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Mr. Sudhir Tewari, Ms. Mehul Gulati, Mr. Naman Chowdhary, Mr. Rachit, Mr. Tarun Maan, Ms. Sonali Singh and Ms. Kavya, Advocates for D-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)

I.A. 8465/2023 (u/O VII Rule 11 of CPC) in CS(OS) 93/2023

1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff inter alia seeking a decree of declaration and permanent injunction.

2. This application has been filed under Order VII Rule11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter ‘CPC’) seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that the plaintiff has no right or interest in the properties that are subject to the said suit in light of Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as the subject properties belong to the grandfather of the plaintiff.

3. In this regard, re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top