SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10272

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NITU SINGH VS. RAJEEV SAUMITRA AND ORS


$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 353/2025 PUSHKAR RAJ THAKUR .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Muskan Garg and Mr. Himanshu Goyal, Advs.

versus GOOGLE LLC AND ANR. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Mamta Rani Jha, Ms. Shruttima Ehersa, Mr. Rohan Ahuja and Ms.

Diya Viswanath, Advs. for D-1.

Mr. Shreyans Jain, Adv. for D-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 01.12.2025 I.A. 26541/2025

1. The present application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 has been filed by the Defendant No.2 for setting aside of the ad-interim ex-parte mandatory injunction granted by way of the Order dated 27.05.2025 passed by this Court in the present Suit.

2. This Court on 28.10.2025 had observed as under:- “2. Though the present application is essentially a reply to the application filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of CPC, wherein interim directions were passed, the only portion of the present application which requires consideration by this Court is being reproduced as under:

“.....Most significantly, the Plaintiff misled this Hon’ble Court into believing that Defendant No. 2, a small foreign entity, had been duly served and placed on notice for the hear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top