SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2

DELHI HIGH COURT
A., J
Ram Sarup and Another v. Raj Dulari


Table of Content
1. eviction proceedings led to administrative rent fixation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. cross objections detail disagreements on rent claims. (Para 3 , 4)
3. interim rent order impacts liability during proceedings. (Para 5 , 6)
4. landlord can reclaim arrears post-eviction, limitation not applicable. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
5. final judgment confirms rent claims as valid. (Para 11)

1. In their written statement dated November 2, 1965, filed in reply to an eviction petition of Raj Dulari respondent landlady, the appellant - tenants made a prayer for fixation of standard rent under the Delhi Rent Control Act , 1958, herein called 'the Act', for the premises in dispute, which had been taken on rent in 1958. An application under S.15(2) of the Act was filed by the landlady for directions to the appellants for deposit of arrears of rent due from February 1, 1962 at the rate of Rs. 175/- per month. On March 15, 1963 the Additional Controller fixed Rs. 125/- per month as the interim rent, under S.15(3) of the Act and directed the arrears and future rent to be paid at that rate. The eviction petition however, was dismissed in default on February 6, 1965. In the meantime, the appellant tenan













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top