SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5

DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Puri P. D. v. State


Table of Content
1. details of the complaint and evidence against the petitioner. (Para 1 , 2)
2. trial court processes and the petitioner's admissions. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's reasoning regarding the applicability of law. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)

1. This petition has arisen out of the complaint filed by the Drugs Inspector. Delhi Administration, under S.27(a) read with S.18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (hereafter called "the Act").

2. The Drugs Inspector stated in the complaint that he had recovered Items 1 to 23 mentioned in the recovery memo which were drugs within the meaning of S.3(b) of the Act and that had been on the 23rd of February, 1972. The Drugs were recovered from the premises of the petitioner. Certain bills and cash - memos were also recovered which disclosed the sources from which the drugs had been purchased by the petitioner. A recovery memo was prepared in respect thereof. The Drugs Inspector made inquiries from the firms from which the drugs had been purchased by the petitioner. In paragraph 6 the complaint alleged : -
"That the accused had no licence to sell, stock and exhibit for sale and distribute drugs at his premises mentioned above and that he is not





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top