DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Miss Azra Seema Iyengar v. J. P. S. Oberoi and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and context. (Para 1) |
| 2. details regarding the attendance issues and communications. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments from both sides regarding the adherence to university norms. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. legal principles concerning procedural fairness. (Para 5) |
| 5. the court's decision on the application of university regulations. (Para 6) |
| 6. discussion on the interpretation of attendance requirements. (Para 7) |
| 7. conclusion on flexibility for attendance in postgraduate settings. (Para 8) |
| 8. the final ruling and implications for the petitioner. (Para 9 , 10) |
1.This petition under Art.226 of the Constitution of India by a student of M. A. (Previous) of the University of Delhi, in the Department of Sociology, is directed against orders of the Head of the Department of Sociology detaining the petitioner on the ground that on account of shortfall in attendance for the full - time regular course of study, she was not eligible to appear for the M.A. (Previous) Examination in Sociology in April, 1978.
2. The facts and circumstances leading to the petition may be briefly stated. The petitioner has been a student of M. A. (Previous) in the Department of Sociology of the Univer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.