SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5

DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Miss Azra Seema Iyengar v. J. P. S. Oberoi and Another


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Shri Aggarwal
For the Respondents: Shri Chaudhary

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and context. (Para 1)
2. details regarding the attendance issues and communications. (Para 2)
3. arguments from both sides regarding the adherence to university norms. (Para 3 , 4)
4. legal principles concerning procedural fairness. (Para 5)
5. the court's decision on the application of university regulations. (Para 6)
6. discussion on the interpretation of attendance requirements. (Para 7)
7. conclusion on flexibility for attendance in postgraduate settings. (Para 8)
8. the final ruling and implications for the petitioner. (Para 9 , 10)

1.This petition under Art.226 of the Constitution of India by a student of M. A. (Previous) of the University of Delhi, in the Department of Sociology, is directed against orders of the Head of the Department of Sociology detaining the petitioner on the ground that on account of shortfall in attendance for the full - time regular course of study, she was not eligible to appear for the M.A. (Previous) Examination in Sociology in April, 1978.

2. The facts and circumstances leading to the petition may be briefly stated. The petitioner has been a student of M. A. (Previous) in the Department of Sociology of the Univer










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top