Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Indo-Keniyan Industrial Enterprises (M/s.) v. M/s. Metal Forgings (P) Limited
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context and background of the case. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondents' arguments against the contempt application. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 29) |
| 3. court's analysis of the legal aspects of contempt. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 38) |
| 4. criteria for determining if an undertaking is made to the court. (Para 17 , 19) |
| 5. court’s authority and enforcement of its own orders. (Para 37) |
| 6. court's decision and punishment imposed. (Para 39) |
1. This is an application under S.10 and S.12 of the Contempt of Courts Act (in short the 'Act') for committal proceedings against the respondents. The facts germane to the decision of this petition succinctly are that at the relevant time Shri G. L. Seenik was the sole proprietor of M/s. Indo Kenyan Industrial Enterprises (hereinafter referred to as the 'petitioner'). The said proprietary concern of Shri G. L. Seenik is a perpetual lessee of a plot No. B - 18, Industrial Area, Phase - I, Maya Puri, New Delhi. Respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Company') is a private limited company and is carrying on Metal Forgings Industry. It
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
