DELHI HIGH COURT
S. Ranganathan, J
John Richard Brady and Others v. Chemical Process Equipments P. Ltd. and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the fodder production unit and defendants' involvement (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 2. defendants' contentions on copyright and jurisdiction (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. prima facie case and requirement for injunction (Para 14 , 19 , 34 , 37) |
| 4. court's analysis on pleadings and jurisdiction (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. court's final order granting injunction (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
1. By this application under O.39 Rr. 1 and 2 read with S.151, C.P.C. plaintiffs have prayed for an ad interim injunction to restrain the Defendants from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in Machines that are substantial imitation and reproduction of the design, manuals and Drawings of the Plaintiffs Fodder Production Unit and thereby amounting to infringement of the Plaintiffs Copyright therein, or from dealing in those Machines made on the basis of information and knowhow disclosed to them by the Plaintiffs in conditions of strict confidence, and from doing any other thing as is likely to lead to passing off the Defendants' products as those of the plaintiffs.
2. In the Suit, the Plaintiffs have sought permanent injunction to restrain the D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.