DELHI HIGH COURT
Sat Pal, J
Wellman – Appellant
Versus
NCR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts underlying the joint venture agreement. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding contractual obligations. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. judicial interpretation of the letter of intent. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 4. court's ruling on the injunction. (Para 23 , 24) |
1. The facts giving rise to this interim application are that the applicants are carrying business, inter alia, as manufacturers / dealers in software, microchip encapsulation, textiles and other products in India. The respondent is a foreign company incorporated in USA having it world head quarters at South Patterson, Boulvard, Dayton, Ohio, U. S. A. The respondent manufactures computer software, hardware, ATMs and other products. In view of the large potential in Indian Market, the respondent was desirous of establishing a joint venture in India for manufacture of its various hardware and software products in India. In or about middle of 1985. One Jim Baker of United States Consulate at Bombay approached the applicant with information that the respondent was looking for a joint venture partner for producing, marketing and servicing its hardware and software products in India. The applicant showed keen interest in entering in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.