Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
Jaspal Singh, J
Jayashree Ravi – Appellant
Versus
University of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility criteria for ll.b. course. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. evolution of right to education under art. 21. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 18 , 26) |
| 3. discrimination by 50% eligibility cutoff. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 31) |
| 4. administrative convenience versus individual's rights. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 5. conclusion on the unconstitutionality of the 50% cutoff. (Para 52 , 53 , 75) |
1. Rule D. B.
2. By consent of parties, we have heard the matter on merits.
3. By this writ petition, Jayashree Ravi and Anil Kaushal question the legality and vires of a condition imposed by the University of Delhi in the matter of eligibility of the persons to take an entrance examination for the 3 Year LL.B. course conducted by the University of Delhi through its Law Faculty.
4. It is stated in the petition that Jayashree Ravi did obtain a degree in B.A. from the University of Delhi (10+2+3) scheme in the year 1983, having passed the B.A. examination in the third division.
5. It is also stated in the petition that Anil Kaushal did obtain B.Com. (Pass) degree in the Year 1980, having passed the examination held for that purpose by the University of Delhi, in the third division.
6. Jayashr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
