DELHI HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Miss. Sangita – Appellant
Versus
Mrs. Usha Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners detained based on alleged prostitution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments about legality of detention and raiding party. (Para 5 , 7 , 23) |
| 3. mandatory nature of compliance with protective procedures. (Para 12 , 24) |
| 4. final ruling favoring petitioners, setting aside lower court order. (Para 37) |
1. These are three Revision Petitions Nos. 219/94, 227/94 and 10/95 preferred by Miss. Sangita, Mrs. Usha Singh, Mrs. Pooja and Rekha. Besides the above, Mrs. Usha also filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 872/94. All the aforesaid petitions are being taken up together as they raise the same pleas and legal issues which can be disposed of by a common judgment and order.
2. Brief facts which led to the presentation of the present petitions are as under : that Inspector P. L. Suri, S. H. O. PS Kamla Market was present at G. B. Road along with a lady constable and staff in connection with his usual patrolling duty during the night of June 12, 1994. He received a secret in formation that certain minor girls were indulging in prostitution in premises No. 5216, G. B. Road, Delhi. On receipt of the said information, he organised a raiding party and included therein two members of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.