SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7

DELHI HIGH COURT
Additional District Judge, J
Kishan Dutt Verma v. Baby Parul (Minor)


Table of Content
1. context of marital relationships and responsibilities. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's observation on the appellant's neglect. (Para 4 , 5)
3. legal obligations under hindu adoptions and maintenance act. (Para 9 , 12)
4. final order regarding maintenance adjustments. (Para 20 , 21)

1. These two appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 1st October, 2002 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in suit Nos. 183/2001 and 184/2001.

2. The Appellant, a practicing advocate in the District Courts, got married to Rajni Bala on 17th February 1991. They are the parents of both the Respondents. Parul (the Respondent in FAO No. 117 of 2003) was born on 27th June, 1993 while Geetanshu (the Respondent in FAO No. 89 of 2003) was born on 7th March, 1997. Quite clearly, they are minors and both are studying in school.

3. According to their mother who filed the suit on their behalf, the Appellant has totally neglected the family with the result that she has to live with her parents (her father is an ex - serviceman from the Air Force), who also help in looking after the children. In these circumstances, the mother was compelled to file a petition in May 1995 under S.125































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top