Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Malik O. P. v. M.C.D. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of legal proceedings regarding property rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. actions taken by municipal authorities in response to complaints. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. analysis of the lt. governor's findings and reasoning. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. understanding the provision of the dmc act related to misrepresentation. (Para 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. discussion on co-ownership and implications of building regulations. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. consideration of the legal viability of municipal actions in co-ownership disputes. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. final judgment restoring prior orders and quashing the lt. governor's decision. (Para 33 , 34) |
1. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 22-10-2003 passed by the Lt. Governor in appeal No. 93/2003-CA. By said order, the Lt. Governor reversed the order dated 2-7-2003 passed by the appellate tribunal, MCD in appeal No. 46/AT-MCD/94. The appellate tribunal, vide order dated 2-7-2003 upheld order dated 11-1-1994 revoking sanction obtained for further construction on property No. C-100, Anand Niketan, New Delhi.
2. Petitioner and his brother, late Shuri K.L. Malik were the co-lessees
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
