SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2

DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Delhi Book Store (M/s.) v. K. S. Subramaniam
I. A. No. 7418/2002



Failure of defendant to establish triable issues regarding unpaid amounts and interest leads to summary judgment for the plaintiff.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 37, Rule 3 - Summary suit for recovery - Plaintiff, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit against the defendant for recovery of dues amounting Rs. 20,24,000/- based on invoices and dishonored cheques - Defendant admitted some purchases but denied others and sought unconditional leave to defend - Court held that triable issues were not established as defendant's claims contradicted his own letters - Interest claim not established due to lack of written stipulation in the contract - Application for leave to defend dismissed and suit decreed for the plaintiff. (Paras 1, 4, 11, 12)

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and the financial dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. defendant's arguments against the suit and critical denial. (Para 4 , 10)
3. court's thorough examination of evidence and letters. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11)
4. establishment of wrong claims regarding interest. (Para 6)
5. final conclusion on the non-sustainability of defendant's application. (Para 12)

1. I. A. No. 7418/2002 is an application filed by the defendant under Order 37 , Rule 3, sub-rule 5 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') praying for grant of unconditional leave to defend the suit. The plaintiff is a registered partnership concern with its office at 5, Anari Road, Darya Ganj, Delhi. The firm is engaged in the business of marketing and printing books. It also is an importer of printed books. Mr. Vijay Ahuja is one of the registered partners of the partnership concern and has signed and verified the plaint and instituted the present suit on behalf of the partnership firm.

2. The defendant had approached the plaintiff on 6th May, 1998 for purchase of printed books on credit-basis. After negotiations, the plaintiff agreed to supply the printed books to the defendant on credit-basis. An agreement dated 8th May, 1998 was executed between the parties. As per the agreement the defendant was to issue post-dated cheques in respect of various purchases, which were to be honoured on presentation. The purchase, issuance of cheques and the liability of the defendant had been stated by the plaintiff in paragraph 5 of the plaint, which reads as under :-
"That the defendant purchased the printed books vide invoice No. 020248 dated 9-5-98 amounting Rs. 5,00,000/- and also purchased books vide invoice No. 20269 dated 19-5-98 amounting Rs. 18,24,000/-. The copies of invoices are filed herewith and marked as Annexure A-2 and 3. The defendant at the time of purchasing the printed books in respect of invoices bearing No. 020248 and No. 20269 has issued the following post dated cheques

The defendant at the time of handing over the aforesaid cheques assured the plaintiff that all the above cheques drawn on State Bank of Travancore shall be honoured on presentation. The plaintiff firm has been maintaining a proper account in respect of purchase as made by the defendant. The payments made by the defendant were duly shown in the statement of account as maintained by the plaintiff firm. A true and correct statement of defendant as maintained by the plaintiff firm is filed herewith and may be read as part of the plaint. The same is marked as an Annexure A-4."

3. It is further pleaded case of the plaintiff that as per the accounts, a sum of Rs. 20,24,000/- was outstanding against the defendant which amount, the defendant failed to liquidate despite repeated requests. As per the terms and conditions for the supply of material, the defendant was also liable to pay interest @ 18% per annum on the overdue amount. The prevalent market rate of interest as also the amount paid by the defendant within the credit period is also 18% p.a. On this ground the plaintiff is stated to be entitled to receive a sum of Rs. 3,64,320/- on account of interest. On this premise, the plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of Rs. 23,88,320/-. The defendant vide their letter dated 25th June, 1998 agreed to make the payment within a week, but despite that assurance, no payment was received and the plaintiff again requested the defendant vide their letter dated 6th November, 1998 to clear the cheques which were due. This was replied by the defendants vide their letter dated 13th November, 1998, requesting therein not to present the cheques, as the cheques received from the defendant from its parties were received back dishonoured. Vide letter dated 4th December, 1998 and 22nd December, 1998 the plaintiff had requested the defendants to clear the dues. The only reply that was received from the end of the defendant was in the letter dated 23rd December, 19


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top