Varun Sharma (Carlay) v. State (NCT) and Others

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2011 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2

DELHI HIGH COURT
,
Varun Sharma (Carlay) v. State (NCT) and Others

Table of Content
1. background of the marriage and subsequent allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 10 , 14)
2. arguments concerning the implications of prior petitions on the current proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 13)
3. court's perspective on handling matrimonial disputes and charges. (Para 6 , 15 , 16)
4. judicial conclusions on framing charges and ensuring justice. (Para 17)
5. final decision and direction regarding charge framing. (Para 18)

1. Complainant (Respondent No. 2) is husband of Respondent No. 3. Petitioner is brother - in - law (wife's husband) of Respondent No. 2. In the month of April, 1997, Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 met each other in a train while travelling from Delhi to Hyderabad. They became friends. They continued to meet thereafter. With the passage of time love blossomed between them. Ultimately, they got married on 28th November, 1997 at Arya Samaj Mandir, Rathkhana, Bikaner according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. It appears that after the marriage their relations became estranged. Respondent No. 2, inter alia, alleged that Respondent No. 3 had concealed her real age, her marital status and the fact that she was having two children out of her previous wedlock with one Wasif Khal