Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Mr. Anup J. Bhambhani, JJ
Rajesh Tyagi v. Jaibir Singh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. investigative challenges and responses outlined. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural necessity for information acquisition from relevant parties. (Para 3 , 12) |
| 3. suggestions for improved reporting procedures discussed. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 4. court's authority to modify procedures for efficiency. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 5. implementation timeline and responsibilities outlined. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
1. Mr. Sidharth Luthra and Mr. Anup J. Bhambhani, learned amici curiae submit that they had convened a meeting yesterday in terms of the order dated 8th December, 2014 which was attended by Mr. Kirtiman Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Mr. Saleem Ahmed, learned Standing Counsel for Delhi Police, Mr. Anil Shukla, Joint Commissioner of Police (Traffic) and Mr. Jayant Sud, Advocate. It is submitted that Delhi Police has shown their concern with respect to paras 24, 28, 36, 46, 48, 49, 56(s), 56(t), 92, 101(f), 101(g) and 101(h) and 102(i) of the Detailed Accident Report (DAR). The learned amici curiae have handed over the minutes of the meeting held on 11th December, 2014, which are taken on record.
2. Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
