SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5688

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
V. K. Jain, J
Taneja Developers and Infrastructure Ltd. v. Rajinder Kaur Bains


Table of Content
1. background of the housing complaint and payment details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's directive regarding compensation and terms of possession. (Para 3 , 4)
3. delay in possession and relevant contractual timelines. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. compensation mandate and legal precedent application. (Para 8 , 9)

1. The complainant booked a residential flat with the appellant in a project, namely, ˜Wellington Heights' which the appellant is developing in Mohali. Flat No. J - 0303 admeasuring 1,160 sq.ft. was allotted to the complainant for a basic price of Rs. 30,74,000. The total cost of the flat came to Rs. 34,83,600. The price of the flat was payable in instalments linked with the construction and the last instalment comprising 10% of the basic sale price was payable on offer of possession. The case of the complainant is that despite she having paid Rs. 33,18,000 to the appellant, the possession of the flat, which ought to have been offered by 3.5.2015, was not offered. The complainant, therefore, approached the concerned State Commission by way of a consumer complaint seeking possession of the allotted flat along with compensation, etc. She also sought refund of the amount of Rs.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top