Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
M. Shreesha, J
Kolhapur Sports Association v. Hasmukh Premji Gala
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over property delivery and responsibilities. (Para 1 , 2 , 10) |
| 2. discussion of liability in partnership context. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 16) |
| 3. court's affirmation of lower court's findings. (Para 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's dismissal of revision petitions with costs. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
1. This dispute relates to 2004, we are in 2018.
Heard Mr. Anand Patwardhan, learned Counsel for the revisionist firm; also heard Mr. K. V. Girish Chowdary, learned Counsel for the stated new partners of the revisionist firm; and also heard Ms. Ranjan Doshi, learned Counsel for the respondents - complainants.
2. Perused the material on record.
The brief facts, shorn of unnecessary detail, are that the complainants, Mr. Hasmukh Gala, Mr. Harakchand Gala, Mrs. Geetaben K. Patel, Smt. Leenaben M. Patel and Mrs. Jyoti V. Kulkarni, booked galas (shops) bearing Nos. 18, 17, 14, 15 and 19 respectively and paid Rs. 1,50,000 , Rs. 1,50,000, Rs. 2,40,000, Rs. 2,40,000 and Rs. 1,50,000 respectively to the revisionist firm, by way of part consideration. The price of gala Nos. 18, 17 and 19 was Rs. 2,00,000 each, the price of gala Nos. 14 and 15 was Rs. 2,90,000 each. All the purchasers - complainant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
