SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4376

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
A.S. Dave, J
Complainant – Appellant
Versus
Builder – Respondent


Table of Content
1. complaint details initial agreement and subsequent issues regarding delivery and facilities. (Para 1 , 2)
2. final directions on refunds and claims regarding amenities. (Para 3 , 8)
3. court addresses contractual obligations and defines compensation eligibility. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

1. The complainant who is the respondent in FA / 680/2013 and appellant in FA / 722/2013, entered into an agreement with the appellant in FA / 680/2013 who is the respondent in FA / 722/2013 for purchase of a residential flat admeasuring 850 sq. ft. of built - up area (inclusive of the balcony area). The possession, as per the agreement executed between the parties on 11.11.1995, was to be delivered to the complainant by December 1995. The possession however, was not delivered by December 1995 whereupon a police complaint was lodged by the complainant against the builder. The parties then executed a supplementary agreement dated 2.1.1997 whereby the builder agreed to deliver possession by 30.6.1997 and also agreed to reimburse rent with effect from 1.1.1997. The possession of the flat was delivered to the complainant on 27.11.1997. The case of the complainant is that the actual built - up ar
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top