Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Mr. Sanjeev Singh, J
Sh. Rajan Handa – Appellant
Versus
M3M India Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaints against builders regarding refund and construction completion. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. builder's defenses and claims regarding agreements and payments. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on contract nature and builder's practices. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. final decision regarding the refund and payment conditions. (Para 10) |
1. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. A.R. Takkar, Advocate, for the opposite parties, through video conferencing.
2. Sh. Rajan Handa (the complainant) has filed this complaint for directing M3M India Private Limited and another (opposite - parties), (hereinafter referred to as the builder) (i) to refund the entire amount of Rs.46,36,730 along with interest @ 24% per annum w.e.f. 14.5.2012 till the date of actual refund as deposited by him; (ii) to pay compensation of Rs.20,00,000, for mental trauma, harassment and hardship caused to the complainant; (iii) to pay Rs.1,00,000 to the complainants as the cost of litigation and (iv) any other relief which the Commission deems fit and proper, in the fact and circumstances of the case, be passed.
3. The facts as stated in the complaint are that the builder was a company, engage
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
