NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Mr. C. K. G. Nair, J
Dushyant Sood and Smt. Charu Sood – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Vatika Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. booking details and contract terms established. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's accountability discussion for builder's claims. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. court ruled on compensation and possession timelines. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. Heard Mr. Bhupendar Pratap Singh, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. S.K. Sahani, Advocate, for the opposite party through video conferencing.
2. Dushyant Sood and Smt. Charu Sood (the complainants) filed this complaint for directing M/s. Vatika Limited (the opposite party), (hereinafter referred to as the builder) (i) not to create third party right, interest or title in property, bearing number - 3/240 / Simplex / ST.82D - 18 / Signature 2 Vila, during pendency of the complaint, (ii) declare the demand dated 30.5.2017 as illegal to the extent that it exceeds Rs.5,44,857.27, the amount that the complainants are liable to pay at the time of taking possession, (iii) direct the builder to handover possession of the villa to the complainants on payment of Rs.5,44,857.27 (iv) to pay compensation of Rs.44,59,565.16, (v) to pay compensation of Rs.15,00,000, for mental agony and harassment, (vi) to pay Rs.one lakh as the cost of litigation, (vii) to grant pendent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.