Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Not mentioned, ACJ
Kailashchandra Bansal College of Technology v. Deepika Chauksey
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under the consumer protection act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments related to consumer rights versus educational services. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court observations on the jurisdiction of educational institutions. (Para 9) |
| 4. court's ruling on the maintainability of the complaint. (Para 10) |
| 5. final conclusion and dismissal of the complaint. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. This Revision Petition has been filed by Kailashchandra Bansal Collage of Technology (hereinafter referred to as ,the Petitioner Institute) under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challanging the Order dated 7.5.2016, passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bhopal (herein after referred to as the State Commission), whereby the Appeal preferred by the Petitioner herein dismissed and the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhopal was upheld.
2. The facts giving rise to the present Revision Petition are that the Complainant / Respondent herein got admission in MBA 2nd year in the Petitioner Institute and deposited a fee of Rs. 32,300 on 3.10.2009. Thereafter, on 29.10.2009, she applied f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
