Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Dinesh Singh (Presiding Member), Karuna Nand Bajpayee (Member)
Bipan Modi v. Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and nature of the appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of payment obligation and timeline. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. findings on payment conditions and rebate in the ruling. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments regarding adherence to original terms. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. judicial assessment of the complainant's position and conclusion. (Para 10 , 11) |
1. This petition has been filed under S.21(b) of the Act 1986 in challenge to the State Commission's Order dated 18.11.2013 in appeal No. 1537 of 2009 arising out of the District Commission's Order dated 20.8.2009 in complaint No. 291 of 2008.
2. We have heard the learned Counsel and have perused the material on record including inter alia the District Commission's Order dated 20.8.2009, the State Commission's impugned Order dated 18.11.2013 and the petition.
3. The matter relates to a residential plot allotted by the development authority (the respondent herein) to the complainant (the petitioner herein).
The complainant was the subsequent allottee of a residential plot admeasuring 300 sq. yards which was transferred to him from the original allottee vide the development authority's letter dated 25.3.2002. He submitted site and construc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
