Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Bail Application No. 3750/2021 and Bail Application No. 3921/2021 – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek bail for economic offenses. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defense argues against evidence linking petitioners to investors' fraud. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 3. state argues against bail due to gravity and previous conduct of petitioners. (Para 7 , 8 , 12 , 15) |
| 4. bail considerations balanced against gravity of the charges. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. court grants bail with conditions, emphasizing personal liberty rights. (Para 21 , 23) |
1. The Petitioners seek regular bail in FIR No. 89/2019 dated 01.06.2019 registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing for offences under S.406/420/409/120B of the Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, "IPC").
2. The facts, in brief, leading up to these petitions are as follows:
a. A complaint was filed by ex - serviceman, Sh. Dharmender Singh, stating that SMP IMPEX Pvt. Ltd. (Hello Taxi) (hereinafter, "the Company"), and its Directors / Officials, Dr. Saroj Mahapatra, Mr. Rajesh Mahto, Ms. Daisy Vijay Menon, Mr. Sunder Singh Bhati and other unknown persons had committed cheating and fraud.
b. It is stated that the Complainant had received a message and an email from the Company stating that if he invested his money, they would give him a 200% retur
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
