Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Unspecified, J
Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
the complainant – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court addresses the procedural aspects of the revision petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court emphasizes the importance of timely resolution of valid insurance claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. court reviews the awarded compensation and highlights the duty of the insurance company. (Para 6 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. court evaluates submissions and the conduct of parties in relation to the claim. (Para 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court delivers its final order highlighting payment directives and dismissal of delay. (Para 13 , 14) |
1. This revision petition has been filed under S.21(b) of the Act 1986 in challenge to the Order dated 18/12/2008 of the State Commission in appeal No. 1091 of 2006 arising out of the Order dated 28/09/2006 of the District Commission in complaint No. 152 of 2006.
2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the two sides and have perused the record including inter alia the Order dated 28/09/2006 of the District Commission, the impugned Order dated 18/12/2008 of the State Commission and the petition.
3. In the interest of justice, in order to provide fair opportunity to the Insurance Company (the revisionist herein), and to dispose of the revision after going into the merits (rather t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
