SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Unnamed Judge, J
Ankur Nayyar v. G. B. M. Developers & Promoters (P) Ltd.


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Aman Sharma

1. The present Appeal has been filed against the order dated 11/10/2018 of Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (for short "the State Commission") in Consumer Complaint No. 1074/2017. This Appeal has been filed by the Complainant alleging that he had asked for refund of the deposited money but the State Commission had ordered for registration of the sale deed. It is submitted that the project was declared illegal in the year 2009 since the licence of the developer, i.e. the Respondent, had expired and that the Tehsildar had declared on 16/02/2018 that no sale deed can be executed in respect of this project. It is therefore submitted that the order of the State Commission be set aside and that the entire deposited amount be ordered to be refunded to the Complainant along with interest. It is contended that the Complainant is ready to hand over the possession of the subject flat to the Respondent.

2. The Respondents have not attended the proceedings despite service and therefore, ex parte arguments heard on behalf of the Complainant.

3. The facts as narrated by the Complainant in the Complaint are that the Complainant is a software engineer by profession and







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top