Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
M. S. M. Anis, J
Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Complainants – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaint filed for insurance denial. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. terms of insurance policy define coverage eligibility. (Para 4 , 10 , 17) |
| 3. court emphasizes compliance with specific insurance contract terms. (Para 7 , 12 , 19) |
| 4. strict interpretation of insurance policies is required. (Para 21 , 24) |
| 5. revision result bars future claims under similar circumstances. (Para 26) |
1. This Revision Petition has been preferred by the Petitioner against the impugned Order dated 3.6.2020 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai in F.A. No. 908 of 2017. Vide the impugned Order, the State Commission had dismissed the Appeal while upholding the Order dated 14.8.2017 passed in Complaint Case No. 59 of 2017 of the District Forum, Osmanabad.
2. Brief facts of the case are that a Consumer Complaint was filed before the District Forum, Osmanabad, by Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 / Complainants against the Petitioner / Opposite Party No. 1 and Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 herein.
3. The Government of Maharashtra vide Resolution No. Sheavi - 2015 / Pr. No. 159/11 - A dated 26.11.2015 resolved to provide Accidental Insurance Coverage to the farmers in the St
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
